<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Disqus on Kliku Kliku</title><link>https://klikukliku.dev/tags/disqus/</link><description>Recent content in Disqus on Kliku Kliku</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://klikukliku.dev/tags/disqus/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Disqus Comments in Hugo: Setup Guide and Performance Analysis</title><link>https://klikukliku.dev/posts/hugo-comments-disqus/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://klikukliku.dev/posts/hugo-comments-disqus/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disqus is probably the first solution that comes to mind when we think about comments on static sites. It has been with us since 2007, supports millions of websites, and takes the burden of building a backend off our shoulders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I decided to check what its integration with Hugo looks like in 2026, but mostly, what the real cost of this convenience is. I ran performance tests on this blog, and the results might surprise you.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>